Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: Shark Guard users (especially with 4" ports) come on in please!

  1. #1

    Shark Guard users (especially with 4" ports) come on in please!

    I think I'm going to get the ARK setup for my new to me unisaw and will probably go with the 4" connection on the guard. My saw doesn't have a cabinet port so I'm wondering if I'd even miss our with the 4" shark setup?
    Thoughts and opinions are appreciated!
    Thanks
    Grant

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    153
    Hi Grant

    I owned a Shark guard with a 4" port but it really isn't 4" as it narrows down to about a half of that which forms a choke point delivering little suction. It is better than nothing. You really need a high powered (>3hp) dust collector for it to work well.

    I ended up selling my table saw including that guard and bought a Sawstop whose guard is designed to redirect the dust to its port and it works well.

  3. #3
    Johnny did you have it on a high powered collector? I building Bill Pentz's design - custom cyclone & blower housing, 16" impeller with a 5hp motor. I'm tired of the fine dust

  4. #4
    I like my sharkgaurd ARK for a 1980 era contractor. Have 2 1/2 hose on top which is powered by a vaccuum, and a 4 inch thru the cab that is powered by a 3hsp grizzly ..I get virtually no wood dust on the sawtop. Ripping can throw a little more than crosscutting.
    Be the kind of woman that when your feet hit the ground each morning, the devil says, "oh crap she's up!"


    Tolerance is giving every other human being every right that you claim for yourself.

    "What is man without the beasts? If all the beasts are gone, men would die from great loneliness of spirit. For whatever happens to the beasts will happen to man. All things are connected. " Chief Seattle Duwamish Tribe

  5. #5
    So is it worth while getting the 4" shark gaurd? Or is a smaller diameter one going to work the same? I could use a 4" hose and adapt down to smaller size. Is it worth the extra $15 for the 4"? Vs the 3" or 2.5".

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Highland MI
    Posts
    4,526
    Blog Entries
    11
    I have the 3" on my G1023 with a 5" bottom. 2 hp Oneida SDG. Works fine. To me, having one with a honkin' 4" hose was just too big visually. Don't have the newer ARK version though. Had to look it up. Adjustable Riving Knife.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Ole Anderson; 03-28-2018 at 8:47 AM.
    NOW you tell me...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    2,162
    Grant I have a 3'' port on my sharkguard. It works too well,sucks up small offcuts and plugs. I close the blast gate about halfway and it works great. If i was ordering another one I would get the 2'' or 2.5''. Remember that the port size also restricts your ability to rip narrower pieces. Mike.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    2,162
    I bought a 5'' holesaw and cut a port in the bottom of my cabinet for dust collection on the saw. My dust collector is a 5h.p. grizzly cyclone and the sharkguard is the ARK. Love the riving knife,my only issue is I dont have a table insert for tilting with the guard yet. I am using a zero clearance one presently. Guard is very good quality aas well as a huge upgrade from the factory guard. Mike.

  9. #9
    Mike what size port is on your guard?
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kees View Post
    I bought a 5'' holesaw and cut a port in the bottom of my cabinet for dust collection on the saw. My dust collector is a 5h.p. grizzly cyclone and the sharkguard is the ARK. Love the riving knife,my only issue is I dont have a table insert for tilting with the guard yet. I am using a zero clearance one presently. Guard is very good quality aas well as a huge upgrade from the factory guard. Mike.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    central PA
    Posts
    1,774
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike Kees View Post
    Grant I have a 3'' port on my sharkguard. It works too well,sucks up small offcuts and plugs. I close the blast gate about halfway and it works great. If i was ordering another one I would get the 2'' or 2.5''. Remember that the port size also restricts your ability to rip narrower pieces. Mike.
    I think I may agree with Mike. I can't remember if I have the 3" or 4", 4 I think, but everything he says I have found to be true. I often take it off for narrow cuts as it CAN be in the way. I'll disagree with an earlier poster who mentioned a choking point. I have no issues sucking up dust, but it will suck up small off cuts with wide open blast gate. I do as he mentioned if there's gonna be small pieces so they don't get shot back to the impeller (2 HP Grizzy cyclone). One other thing though. You will still get debris in the bottom of the cabinet. The over-the-blade will remove much of the fine dust from sawing but some material will still accumulate in the cabinet.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    SE PA - Central Bucks County
    Posts
    65,910
    A larger port on an over-arm collector can certainly help with above-table collection, but IMHO, it doesn't eliminate the need for below table collection, too. The combination is more effective than either one by itself. Of course, you need the "real life" CFM from your DC system to make that work well...air flow matters.
    --

    The most expensive tool is the one you buy "cheaply" and often...

  12. #12
    hopefully I'll have plenty of airflow, I'm building a Pentz cyclone and blower, 16" impeller from clearvue unless I find a different (less expensive!) option coupled with with a 5hp motor
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Becker View Post
    Of course, you need the "real life" CFM from your DC system to make that work well...air flow matters.

  13. #13
    I have a pentz 5hp (early clearvue) with 6" to TS base and 4" to sharkguard - am a fan of more air is better - even cutting MDF there is very little dust that escapes

    can't say if 3" would be noticeably less capable - but like you I have the DC flow so why not use it???

    that DC can run a 6" pipe to the jointer at the same time and not see any decrease in performance - nice to be able to leave both saw and jointer running to go from one to the other without need for messing with blast gates - IMHO got with 4" - dc flow is like tools: rarely do you hear "I got too much"

  14. #14
    Great info Erik thanks for chiming in! Is your main duct 6" or did you go bigger? I was planning on 6" with 5&4 running to the tablesaw, but could make the cabinet take 6"
    Quote Originally Posted by Erik Christensen View Post
    I have a pentz 5hp (early clearvue) with 6" to TS base and 4" to sharkguard - am a fan of more air is better - even cutting MDF there is very little dust that escapes

    can't say if 3" would be noticeably less capable - but like you I have the DC flow so why not use it???

    that DC can run a 6" pipe to the jointer at the same time and not see any decrease in performance - nice to be able to leave both saw and jointer running to go from one to the other without need for messing with blast gates - IMHO got with 4" - dc flow is like tools: rarely do you hear "I got too much"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Alberta
    Posts
    2,162
    Grant the port on my guard is 3'', 5'' ducting to my saw base off a 8'' main duct.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •