Yes, sort of - - My father was on home office payroll, and his company did a lottery of those employees to offer options at $2/. Bad Dad was selected and accepted the offer. The company did IPO at $6/, went to to $60/, split 10:1, went back to $66/, split 10:1 again, and last I remember settled down around $40/ after 2-3 yrs IIRC. He retired at 56.
My (former) company offered me stock options. They went bankrupt.
Not long ago, I read about land for sale in a nearby suburb for what i considered a heady $10k/acre. I lamented that when I moved to the area I could have bought that entire side of town - all of it - for $10k. My BIL laughed, shrugged, and said his family did own it. At the time I moved, I didn't buy it 'cuz I didn't have $10k; his family sold it 'cuz they needed $10k.
...Luck? Investing? Gambling? Each will have to decide.
And my father... he struggled to come up with the cash to buy those options, and it wasn't a lot, certainly not by today's income standards. His windfall IPO did not make him wealthy, since the initial investment was relatively small, but with military retirement, it did allow some breathing room. Good thing he didn't know what the future was at the time... he probably would have sold me into slavery to buy more options. I'd probably do the same.
I'm waiting for my CVS stock to split they were saying when it hits $122 a share that they would split. $103 today.
Time & the ability to have spare funds to invest - are the flies in the ointment where these stories are concerned.
You might hear of one or two - but - you never hear about the millions of people that threw away money on tech stocks like 3Com, US Robotics, Wellfleet, Gateway, Tandy, Packard Bell and a whole host of others I can't come up with on the spur of the moment that were giants in that field that all had ups and downs over the years, then finally went down for the last count.
Even Apple looked like it was down for the count numerous times.
I have to wonder how many investors hung on to Apple stock when Steve Jobs was fired?
AMD has a history of doing that. Matter of fact, when I retired in 2010 - their stock was at an all time low. Had I invested $30k in it and left it there for 30/40 years, I would have maybe broken even at best.I believe AMD has done it over the past 5 or so years, as they have had a serious turn around, going from $2 a share to $110.
My whole point here is - I don't know enough about "playing the market" & how best to turn my losses into profits.
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." - John Lennon
Not really. It's pretty simple, spend less than you make, and invest the rest. And that's not a matter of being a high income earner, there are numerous stories about broke doctors and millionaire receptionists.
No this is true, nobody knows what will happen in the long term, or even often the short term. However, the general trend is up, because the economy is expanding, and if you diversify into about 20-30 stocks you'll have winner to balance out the losers. You don't need to be right all the time, and it's not going to happen, you just need to be right more often than your wrong.
Then don't, buy a low cost index fund, and ignore it for the next whatever many years. The market effected by the economy, and that has been growing, so for the past 100-200 years the trend has been up. Don't feel comfortable with that, buy some US T-bills. Don't like that, hide it in a mattress. The truth is that there is no safety, and you need to make calculated risks. Even doing nothing and bemoaning your fate is a decision and action and it will have consequences.
As I mentioned earlier - I don't and didn't. I chose to sink my money into something else & at 70 years old, I won't be changing any time soon - well - not in that way anyhow . I do have to work out the final details on the exit strategy so I can pass along as musch as possible to the people I think should get it and not the tax man and/or nursing homes.Then don't, buy a low cost index fund, and ignore it for the next whatever many years. T
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." - John Lennon
My use of Apple was as an example.
My question was directed at the concept of those who say, "I don't want to make gobs of money because then I would have to pay taxes on it."
The unsaid part sounds like, "I would rather not have a million dollars if the government would get a dime of it."
That is what baffles me, a person so wrapped up against taxes they would avoid making some money.
For the record my stock picking prowess is nonexistent. That is why the professionals in the fund business do it for me.
jtk
"A pessimist sees the difficulty in every opportunity; an optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty."
- Sir Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
Throughout my life I've found that I have a gambling jinx. The type of gambling doesn't seem to matter. And I know how to casino-gamble, what to do, betting strategies, but when you're jinxed it doesn't matter. Our last weekend trip to Vegas was almost 20 years ago. During that trip, and I counted, I played 27 hands of blackjack, in 3 different casinos over 2 days; I pushed 7 hands, won 0. . What are the odds of going 0 for 27 on a basically 50/50 chance?
Long term investing? I started doing that 'somewhat' in the '80's. First try lasted about about 8 years, cashed out at around an 85% loss. Second try was a mutual fund I started the 90's. After around 12 years and nearly $110k invested via monthly payments, the recessions just kept wiping it out-- I finally cashed out $4400. This was a mutual fund that, before I signed on, posted an over 13% average return the previous 20 years, and I lost over 95% of the money I put in...
Short term investing? Lost $17k on unleaded gas and natural gas Call options one day after one POTUS TV news conference; 'we're going to start looking into these skyrocketing energy prices...' -- next day my options were worthless. Had I went with Put options, my money would have increased over 9x...
So yeah, 'a jinx' may be a bit tongue-in-cheek, but I have no stocks, bonds, retirement accounts, no investments of any kind. And we're way better off than we were 20 years ago...
--YMMV--
========================================
ELEVEN - rotary cutter tool machines
FOUR - CO2 lasers
THREE- make that FOUR now - fiber lasers
ONE - vinyl cutter
CASmate, Corel, Gravostyle
I guess I've never met this person(s), but admittedly they might be out there. However, I have met lots of people who very much factor taxes into any stock sale.
Except in very specific cases, an investor has complete control over the timing of a sale. Why wouldn't they adjust for when and how much tax burden is incurred?
Stocks are really not a guessing game. An educated guessing game, based on a company's past and projected performance, and whether you want stock value gain or dividends.
As for commodity stocks like oil, its all about the project value of the commodity in the next year. Oil is expected to go up, way up, so yes, I would buy oil stock, although the time to buy was about a month ago
Commodities like oil, pork bellies or gold are a bit of a crap shoot, but certainly having a stock portfolio with 10-15% of petroleum stock is never a bad thing.
Regards,
Tom
I never said that.My question was directed at the concept of those who say, "I don't want to make gobs of money because then I would have to pay taxes on it."
The unsaid part sounds like, "I would rather not have a million dollars if the government would get a dime of it."
That is what baffles me, a person so wrapped up against taxes they would avoid making some money.
What I said was, I never figured out how to keep the .gov from sticking their hands deep into my pockets by investing in the market - so - I just never got involved in it.
The unsaid part of it is - I would rather not have a million dollars if the .gov is going to take a huge chunk of it - when I can make a million dollars some other way that the 'gov isn't going to grab a bunch of it.
"Life is what happens to you while you're busy making other plans." - John Lennon
LT capital gains tax rate for most middle class incomes should be 15% IIRC. Hard to beat that … legally at least.
I’d probably go with moonshining; more job satisfaction than Mr. Funk’s idea.