I took an even closer look at the Baileigh ES-6100. It appears that the machine is definitely a copy of the Hammer HS-950. It even oscillates the belt using the same mechanism. It's not a 100% copy, though. There are several items where the Hammer HS-950 is better:
- Better table height adjustment - only one clamp to loosen and table remains perfectly level as you adjust up and down (this is important when the platen is adjusted down at an angle). Baileigh requires two clamp knobs and you need to make sure to keep the table perfectly level when adjusting up and down.
- Better dust collection. Hammer essentially has a 5" dust port (120mm). Baileigh has 4" dust port.
- Better motor. Hammer has a 3HP 2.2kw 12.4A (based on motor plate). Beileigh specifications say 2HP 1.5kw 9.5A.
- More stable stand? Hammer base/stand extends to the full width/length of the machine. Baileigh stand is smaller.
- Better miter gauge (although you have to buy this extra, the miter gauge is much better than what comes with the Baileigh).
There may be several other things on the Hammer that just "feel" better, but I haven't used the Baileigh so I can't comment. So, Hammer is a better machine, but you are going to spend about a $1,000 more (especially when you add in the accessory miter gauge).
That being said, a couple of points for the Baileigh:
- Has an edge support shoe that can be mounted to the table for edge support when using the sander fully 0 degrees flat
- Has a bit of storage available in the base (although you could build your own storage base on the Hammer.
I built my own front frame and floor for the Hammer base so that I could use it to store sanding belts, miter gauge, etc. I also mounted some 4" GBL locking casters for mobility (these work very well):
HS_950_storage.jpg
If the Hammer HS-950 is not in your budget, I would probably recommend the Baileigh ES-6100 as the next option. This is a significantly better machine than the other low end clones (Jet, Oliver, Powermatic 13, Laguna, Grizzly, etc.).