Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: Groove in bottom of plane

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    102

    Groove in bottom of plane

    Hi All,
    I just recieved my very first plane, a #4 Stanley-Bailey Type 13 from the 1920s bought on ebay, in the mail yesterday! Was very excited about it until I saw a long thin groove in the sole, as somebody had run the thing over a nail.

    How much will this effect performance as-is?

    What are my options for repair....I could lap it down, but not sure how much sole would be left.

    Do you think it is worth making a stink about, given it wasn't mentioned on the description?

    Never have used a plane before...I knew vintage would be a challenge, but it is all I can afford.

    Thanks,
    Ray

  2. #2
    I wouldn't worry about it. Just get er cleaned and tuned, and use it.


    Edit. Welcome to the creek!!


  3. Without a picture I don't know how bad this is, but in general it really won't affect performance nor mar your work. I would lap the bottom flat anyway. Once done making the plane reasonably flat, I would just make sure the edges of the groove are relieved by just lightly sanding them a few strokes with fine sandpaper.

    Once you know the plane works well, swaping out the iron for a LN or Hock replacement blade will make the plane even better. But use the original first to see if this [hand planing] is even something you wish to do often enough to justify the cost of the replacement blade.

    Take care, Mike

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    102
    Thanks for the feedback guys...keep it comin! I'm excited to get started. I'll post a pic tonight.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Mission Viejo, CA
    Posts
    17
    Stanley made an aluminum plane at one time, I think it was a #4.

    It would say "4A" on the casting. You could also tell by the heft.

    The reason they made aluminum planes was supposedly to reduce user fatigue.

    The problem with the aluminum was that it was much softer than steel and subject to the damage that you mentioned.

    As long as the blade does not have a cirresponding nick it it you should be fine.

    The following was taken from Patrick leach's website on planes.
    www.supertool.com


    A4 Smooth plane, 9"L, 2"W, 2 1/4lbs, 1925-1935. *One of Stanley's dumber ideas, as can be inferred from their short time of offering, was the aluminum planes. The bed and frog on this plane are made from aluminum, which makes the plane lighter. This was the supposed appeal of these planes, that they are lighter than the iron planes. That, and that they weren't prone to rusting. Rosewood was used for the knob and tote. Despite all these swell features, the planes were a miserable flop.


    These planes were produced at a time when nickel plating appeared on the lever caps. All the ones I've seen have the old-style lever cap, without the new kidney-shaped hole that was first produced in 1933. If you see one of these planes with a lever cap that is nickel plated and has a kidney-shaped hole, it's probably a replacement. The depth adjusting knob is also nickel plated, as well as the lateral adjustment lever.
    They'd be useful tools if you were planing over your head all day, but not many of us do that. Since aluminum oxidizes easily, these planes leave despicable skidmarks (for lack of a better word) on the freshly planed wood. The planes - those that were used, that is - also tend to develop a very ratty look to them. The surface of the aluminum becomes riddled with dings and scratches making them blech to even the casual Stanley collector (well, maybe not all of them, but many of them for certain) - most of them take on a striking resemblance to the lunar landscape after being used. Those that are in mint condition have some appeal about them, but they still have look like of an aluminum pot or piece of foil. If you're collecting this stuff, make sure it's aluminum and not some iron plane in aluminum paint clothing - if the weight of the thing doesn't clue you in, a magnet will.
    The aluminum planes were appreciably more expensive than the cast iron models. For instance, the #A4 cost $5.65 at its introduction, whereas the #4 cost $4.20 during the same time. Even back in the Roaring 1920's, consumers were smart enough to avoid a plane that cost over 25% more than one that did a better job. You have to wonder if any heads rolled for this braindead idea? Lucky for us that Stanley didn't make a mitre box, or something like that, out of aluminum. Hey, wait a minute, they did! Let's just say that the company was going through a phase and be done with it.
    God made money so we can go out and buy more tools!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Cockeysville, Md
    Posts
    1,805
    I wouldn't be too worried about it, just flatten the sole enough to make it a usuable tool. Keep in mind that Stanley made planes with grooved soles denoted with a C in the number system #5C #4C etc. that were supposed to reduce friction during use.

    Brian
    The significant problems we encounter cannot be solved at the same level of thinking we were at when we created them.

    The penalty for inaccuracy is more work

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Mascouche, Québec
    Posts
    8
    I don't think you should worry about it. As long as the sole is flat and the blade sharpened you will get fine shavings.
    Roger

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    102
    Great point, Brian...never thought of that.
    Well, I haven't had the chance to get the picture taken because I have 2 major home improvement projects going on at my condo..but I'm convinced it's not a big deal.
    As soon as finish up my diy projects then put in mad week of work, I'll start tunin that plane
    Thanks so much!
    -Ray

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    La Plata, Maryland
    Posts
    199
    Ray, I probably wouldn't give the guy bad feedback, however, I would email him and tell him that his description should have included the groove.

    Most ebayers are very good about including things like that, the more bad feedback they get, the less stuff they sell.

    I wouldn't worry about the groove. Just make sure you sharpen the blade if it's nicked where the groove is.

  10. I read and re-read the orginal post but there really needs to be some more information posted about this groove. I am not very familiar with the Old Stanley Brand, but I am with Lie Neisen and with that brand you can order many of their planes with a groove milled down the sole of the plane. That groove is for the making of fly fishing rods.

    Now if the groove appears to be milled then I would suspect you have a plane that was used in the construction and repair of fly fishing rods. This makes sense as in the 1920's the recreational fishing industry really began to take off. Of course in those days even regular fishing poles were made of wood, not only fly fishing rods.

    Now if the groove looks more like a heavy scratch that wonders and is anything from straight, then you have a problem and everything I type in this reply can be tossed right into the sawdust pile.

    Whether the plane has a fly rod groove or a scratch really does not matter, the person selling you the plane should have disclosed such information.

  11. #11
    raymond, scratches or groves shouldn`t have any effect on the planes operation. here`s a couple of stanleys as the factory supplied them almost 100 yrs. ago...02 tod

    MVC-303S.JPG
    TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN; I ACCEPT FULL LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MY POSTS ON THIS FORUM, ALL POSTS ARE MADE IN GOOD FAITH CONTAINING FACTUAL INFORMATION AS I KNOW IT.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Menlo Park, CA
    Posts
    281

  13. #13
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    102
    The groove does not appear to be put there by Stanley...it wonders across the plane, as if it were run across a nail...I guess pics will be important; I'll post them tonight or tomorrow morn.
    Thanks for the info-
    Ray

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    102
    Here's a pic finally....had issues getting it down below the 100K or so limit.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  15. #15
    A little tuning, flatening, and some high speed continous use , and that scratch will disappear.


    Try using Easy Thumbnails for reducing your pics. Free download on cnet, easy to use.


Similar Threads

  1. Mini Plane review, Mujingfang Smoother??
    By Gene Collison in forum Neanderthal Haven
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-11-2012, 5:59 PM
  2. Stanley 444 Dovetail Plane & 14x Tongue & Groove Planes
    By John Edwards in forum Neanderthal Haven
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-04-2005, 5:45 AM
  3. Veritas Medium Shoulder Plane Reviewed
    By Brad Olson in forum Neanderthal Haven
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-07-2004, 4:04 PM
  4. Woodcraft Rosewood Plow Plane review (long)
    By Marc Hills in forum Neanderthal Haven
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-06-2004, 11:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •