Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Waterlox finish sanding

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    866

    Question Waterlox finish sanding

    I am working on a small cherry side table, a bench with shoe storage, and a mirror frame for our entry. So far I have applied a light coat of dewaxed shellac, sanded, and then applied 3 coats of Waterlox with no sanding between the coats. Now, I would like to sand it, apply the final coat of Waterlox and then buff it.

    For sanding, I want to use power sanders if I am equipped with the right sandpaper.
    I have Festool sanders (3mm orbit 6" and the Rotex) and Brillant paper up to 320 grit and Mirka Abranet abrasives at 400, 600, and up grits. Purely from a grit perspective Mirka Abranet 400 grit sounds reasonable but I am not sure if I need stereate sanding discs instead (is it Festool Titan?) to prevent clogging.
    I assume I should reduce the sander speed when sanding finishes to avoid melting of the finish.

    What would be your recommended approach, something that worked in the past?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Tallahassee, FL
    Posts
    71

    waterlox sanding

    this probably should be in the finishing forum - but one technique I often use at final prep is to use automotive wet sandpaper (the 3M black stuff) 400 then 600 or 800 and a sanding block to hand sand with water, and finish off with wax, this seems to help develop a super smooth finish. Power sanding takes too much off too fast for me.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    108
    Frank, I agree with Terry, a power sander takes off to much material. For what its worth, I use 00000 steel wool lubricated with mineral spirits prior to the last coat. If I want to put on paste wax I use steel wool for that application as well and then buff it.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Southport, NC
    Posts
    3,147
    Finish and between coat sanding are always done by hand. Any mechanical sander is too agressive.

    Waterlox is a brand name of a family of finishing products. Which one are you referring to?
    Howie.........

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    866

    Smile Looks like hand sanding for me...

    Thanks for the responses, looks like I will have to resort to hand sanding. I hate it, but in this case sounds like I am out of options. For some reason, I remember reading somewhere power sanding between coats, but sounds like my recollection is not correct, or at least not the best practice

    Howard, the finish is Waterlox Original Sealer/Finish.

    I will do wet sanding with mineral spirits using 400 then 600 followed by 800 grit paper based on your responses.

    For the final buffing, I was planning on using Mirka Abralon products with paraffin oil as suggested by J. Jewitt. Please do let me know if you any suggestions on this as well.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Shoreline, CT
    Posts
    2,923
    I think power sanding between coats is generally very risky, but with a wipe on finish, it's positively hazardous and not recommended. Three coats is about equivalent to one coat of brushed on varnish. Original/sealer isn't intended for a high gloss finish, though when fully cured it will buff out pretty well. If you want a true high gloss, you would be better off with a final coat of the Waterlox Gloss. It also has higher solids content than the Original/Sealer and can be brushed on to give a thicker film to buff. For best rubbing out give the finish about a month to get really hard as the cure becomes more complete.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    866

    Why is it hazardous?

    Steve,

    I understand the "risky" part, but when it is dry sanded with dust collection, why do you think it is "positively hazardous"?


    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Schoene
    I think power sanding between coats is generally very risky, but with a wipe on finish, it's positively hazardous and not recommended. Three coats is about equivalent to one coat of brushed on varnish. Original/sealer isn't intended for a high gloss finish, though when fully cured it will buff out pretty well. If you want a true high gloss, you would be better off with a final coat of the Waterlox Gloss. It also has higher solids content than the Original/Sealer and can be brushed on to give a thicker film to buff. For best rubbing out give the finish about a month to get really hard as the cure becomes more complete.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Southport, NC
    Posts
    3,147
    >>Howard, the finish is Waterlox Original Sealer/Finish

    The Original Sealer/Finish is quite oil heavy and therefore quite soft. It's not the best choice if you plan to do any work on the finish after the final coat. I agree with Steve than a couple of coats of Original Gloss will give you a finish that, once fully cured, can be sanded and buffed. Let the finish fully cure for 3-4 weeks.
    Howie.........

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Shoreline, CT
    Posts
    2,923
    Only that the there is a much larger risk of cutting through the layers and messing up the finish--not a health hazard. Sorry if my word choice was misleading.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    866

    Smile Sounds like a good plan

    This was the first time I used Waterlox and really like the results so far. However, I did not realize the Original Sealer/Finish was softer and the Original Gloss was harder. I will keep this in mind. Thanks so much for the tips.

    Quote Originally Posted by Howard Acheson
    >>Howard, the finish is Waterlox Original Sealer/Finish

    The Original Sealer/Finish is quite oil heavy and therefore quite soft. It's not the best choice if you plan to do any work on the finish after the final coat. I agree with Steve than a couple of coats of Original Gloss will give you a finish that, once fully cured, can be sanded and buffed. Let the finish fully cure for 3-4 weeks.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    866

    Now that makes sense

    Steve,

    Thanks for the clarification. I am so sensitive to the health and safety aspect of it I thought you meant that.


    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Schoene
    Only that the there is a much larger risk of cutting through the layers and messing up the finish--not a health hazard. Sorry if my word choice was misleading.

Similar Threads

  1. Sanding Sealer Finish
    By Martin Braun in forum Turner's Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-14-2007, 3:51 PM
  2. Satin finish on a guitar?
    By Sam Chambers in forum Project Finishing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-19-2006, 2:32 PM
  3. Wet sanding Waterlox?
    By Tim Solley in forum Project Finishing
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-11-2006, 10:18 AM
  4. Tool Review – Sandboss Pneumatic Sanding Drums
    By Bob Smalser in forum General Woodworking and Power Tools
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-07-2004, 11:59 PM
  5. Tung Oil Finish Practicality
    By Jim Young in forum General Woodworking and Power Tools
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 08-07-2003, 12:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •