round 2
For round 1 discussion see:
http://www.sawmillcreek.org/showthre...hlight=biscuit
Okay, background of the question...
Dining table, compact base, poplar
I went back and forth a bit on the joinery for this table. In the end I chose to go the path of expedience and accuracy. So I used a but joint with 2 #20 biscuits to attach the 1.75" aprons to the 3.625" legs. For a little insurance I used 1.125" x 3" glue blocks inside backing each joint.
This fast construction allowed me to go from rough cut stock to jointed, planed, tapered legs, and assembly in a single day.
I ran a sample piece with dual #20 biscuits, but joined. Even after about half an hour the joint took an impressive beating with a hammer before failure. Failure was not on the glue joint, but back in the biscuit socket where the glue hadn't fully cured. So I felt fairly confident in this construction for the table. Note that I did add glue blocks to reassure myself.
It seems that discussion on this topic quickly turns to tests that don't really apply, a naysayer bandwagon, and a whole slough of everything from buy a domino to only mortise and tenon. Opinions are like...
...well, you know. So lets try to avoid going the path of round #1.
For round number 2 I want to see a clean fight. If you have never used biscuits to attach an apron to a leg then please maintain voyeur status on this thread. If you have tried this please let us know the outcome. Personally the table I glued up this way feels rock solid. I have read of accounts of others building many tables this way, one was a furniture maker who claimed he had never had a failure.
So there it is. I am going to go find my flame retardant keyboard before it gets to hot in here.