Results 1 to 15 of 72

Thread: CS about capirons

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Chris Schwarz:
    While a few people on the forums have burned this topic in effigy, I have found that a reasoned, historical-based discussing of this 18th-century device helps students immensely. Most woodworkers don’t have the patience to wade into the nasty discussions about double irons to extract the useful bits.

    This lecture is about the useful bits. (And why Stanley needs to spanked for almost ruining the technology for us.)

    There has been a reasoned and historical based discussion of this topic on various fora for over seven years. There has been historical and present day evidence presented by Todd Hughes, by me, by Steve Elliott, Chutaro Kato, Gary Blum, Bob Strawn, David Weaver, Bill Tindall, Kees van der Heiden, Wilbur Pan, and Jeff Burks (and more) For years Chris was denying or denigrating our testimony. It is insulting that he now compares himself to the source of this knowledge and paints himself as the voice of reason, knowledge and historical perspective.

    Stanley needs to spanked for almost ruining the technology for us? Schwarz certainly tried to ruin it also.
    Last edited by Warren Mickley; 09-25-2014 at 3:47 PM. Reason: change John to Bob

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •