Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 61

Thread: Squares Are Not Square, and Levels Are Not Level

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    SF Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    15,332
    Quote Originally Posted by Thom Sturgill View Post
    For the 3/4/5 method you just need CONSISTENT units for the method to be accurate. It does not matter whether you use 3/4/5 inches, feet, meters, cubits, or miles.

    If the tape varies unit to unit, (for example, the distance from 1' to 2' is not the same as the distance between the 2' and 3' marks) then it is truly worthless.
    Keerrrrect!! In a pinch, I've just used scrap wood...could've cared less what it's length was...just marked three of 'em one way, 4 of 'em up, and then measure for 5 of 'em across.
    Wood: a fickle medium....

    Did you know SMC is user supported? Please help.

  2. #2
    The Steel Square by Fred T. Hodgson, "A Practical Treatise On the Application of the Steel Square, Containing an Exhaustive Collection of Problems and Solutions." This is 471 pages of more than you ever wanted to know. Back when most carpenters had never been to school, much less learned decimals and fractions or long division, those charts on the framing square were their equivalent of a pocket calculator.

    On a more practical note, an old carpenter who showed me a lot could adjust an off-true framing square with a couple of whacks with his hammer. As I remember, hitting it on the heel tightened and the inside opened, but as the saying goes, "anyone can hit it. experience is knowing where and how hard."

    thnx, jack vines

  3. #3
    If the tape varies unit to unit, (for example, the distance from 1' to 2' is not the same as the distance between the 2' and 3' marks) then it is truly worthless.[/QUOTE]



  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Tucson
    Posts
    5,001
    Blog Entries
    1
    I actually have had a framing square that was out of square. I used a punch and gave it a good smack on the inside corner. Brought it bact to usability. I don't know if a good smack to the outside corner would do the same in the opposite direction though.
    What you listen to is your business....what you hear is ours.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Shiloh, Illinois
    Posts
    543
    Yes, it will.

    thats exactly how you do it. peen the inside or outside corners to adjust the square.

    v/r

    dan
    Building my own Legos!

  6. #6

    Combination square

    So let me guess, the combination square I use all the time is probably junk for checking the squarness of wood after I have jointed and cross cut it.

  7. #7
    Bob, good post, that is one thing we all need to check now and then.

    I have 2 Starretts and they check out right on and I use those as my standard.
    Carpenter squares are a joke in most cases and are not square at all. I showed the guy and HD how bad the ones they had there and he didn't believe it.

    I did buy an M3 square from Price Cutter and it was way off. They do have instructions on how to adjust it and I did and now I am very happy with it.

    Side note, the M3 is a great square to have, I really like the way it handles and the way I can copy a line around a corner.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    112
    Having been a machinist in a past life all I have to say is to drop the dollars once for Starret. It's extremely expensive but there is a reason; they're not just charging for their name. Use the Starrett when things are really critical, like for machine set-up and checking and to check your "users".

  9. #9
    Im not trying to start a fight, but I would recommend checking every square you buy with one you know is true, even a Starrett. I recently had trouble with a 6" Starrett combination square. I got the problem resolved, but the new Starrett square was clearly defective.

    http://www.sawmillcreek.org/showthre...tarrett+square

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Shiloh, Illinois
    Posts
    543
    Hey Lance,

    glad to see you here. i remember your post.

    I check my starretts occasionally also. it's not that im not pleased with their quality, but, im a little paranoid. they always check out though.

    v/r

    dan
    Building my own Legos!

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Mpls, Minn
    Posts
    2,882
    Lance hit it right on, I was always taught to check any set up tool or measuring device before starting, only takes a minute and can save ya grief.

    Al
    Remember our vets, they need our help, just like they helped us.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Southport, NC
    Posts
    3,147

    So, how to tell if your square is square

    No matter how much you spend for a device, you still don't know if it is square. I ran a large tool and die shop and we purchased a number of Brown & Sharp and Starrett devices and some of them were not "square". We had "standards" that our quality department periodically had validated by an outside service that we then used to verify the worker's tools.

    One day, one of our designers brought in two plastic drawing triangles he had purchased at a local art supply store. He had them compared to our standards and they were as accurate as the tools could measure. The triangle cost a couple of dollars each. They would certainly serve very well as the "standard" in any woodworking shop to validate and/or adjust other devices.

    An excellent way to validate the accuracy of the plastic squares is to use two squares on a flat surface. Get a $10-12 plastic 30-60-90 drafting square. To prove it's exactly 90°, take two to a glass counter, put the shorter legs on the counter and face the longer legs away from each other and butt them together (like a teepee). If the legs exactly butt, you can assume you have two perfect 90° angles. Using one of the plastic squares, do the same thing using your other tools. Any that mismatch, means that the tool is not square. You can also take the plastic square with you whenever you go to purchase another tool. Keep your "standard" somewhere where it doesn't get banged up.

    Finally, remember that the wood you are using will expand and contract a couple of thousands from one day to the other. Does't pay to get too uptight.

    While we are at it, I also only purchase the cheapest of adjustable squares. I square them with a drafting triangle and an auger file until they are square across 10". And I own a Bridge City square that isn't that accurate. Stainless steel machinist's squares are only square until you drop them. I have had several over the years and each has found a away to drop to the floor.

    The key is to NEVER use your best square on for day to day measuring. Use it only as a reference tool to verify your other day to day tools.

    In a comparison test reported in Fine Woodworking Magazine a couple of years ago, the Stanley 46-123 square was awarded the best value. It's much less expensive than a Starrett and just as accurate.
    Howie.........

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kanasas City, MO
    Posts
    1,787
    "Stainless steel machinist's squares are only square until you drop them. I have had several over the years and each has found a away to drop to the floor.".......
    Same to be said for the anodized aluminum squares etc... DAMHIKT. I had a purty set of the anodized squares that were pretty accurate when new.... they've all been "adjusted" by re-machining them after sudden stops at the bottom of a free fall.
    I will say it's nice having a machine shop at the day job as our in house gearhead machinist likes to make sure things are rather accurate by his terms which is good 'nuff for me. That and he likes to teach-show how to indicate & set up as priority 1... the actual machining is secondary to a proper set up regardless of material steel, wood...

    Greg

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    84
    We can all over think this issue until the cows come home if we want, but the $150.00 square you can buy out of a fancy magazine isn't worth .02 if your cutter (saw blade) is out of square with your table.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Shiloh, Illinois
    Posts
    543

    Yup,

    I think the main point here is that we are striving to do excellent work and not just "acceptable" work. The goal is to stay as close to "square" as possible. We also need to have the wherewithal to know to check our tools, regadless of brand or price.

    I think im going to check out all of my stuff tonight.

    v/r

    dan
    Building my own Legos!

Similar Threads

  1. Dust Collector Dilemma
    By Bill Leung in forum WorkShops
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 01-06-2009, 11:00 PM
  2. How do you square plywood ?
    By Tony Falotico in forum General Woodworking and Power Tools
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 02-06-2004, 11:26 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •