Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: dowels for workbench joints

  1. #1

    Question dowels for workbench joints

    I have a Dowelmax and am in the process of designing/planning for a small Roubo-style bench made of fir. Would it be crazy to make the joints on the stretchers or even fastening the legs to the top with a load of dowels vs mortise/tenons? Since I am a beginner, I could use the experience with M&T work, but seems like the dowels could make a strong joint and go quicker.

    TIA for any advice.

    Chris

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Chappell Hill, Texas
    Posts
    4,741
    I always like to answer these types of questions with... you'll learn more by doing and experiencing, than by asking.

    It seems you know that mortise and tenon joinery is the proper joint already.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    'over here' - Ireland
    Posts
    2,532
    I'd be cautious unless you could get enough dowels in to end up with similar cross sectional (and even then it won't deliver the same depth of section or bending resistance) and long grain gluing areas to a mortice and tenon.

    Dowels are strong in pure shear (loaded at 90 deg to the length of the dowel), but unless the whole lot is e.g. bolted up tight so the leg to stretcher joints can't get levered open a little there's got to be some risk of having a dowel fail in a racking situation which would apply some bending force to the joint.

    The analogy might be to think about how easy it is to bend say a 1in high stack of unglued veneers versus a piece of solid of the same section.

    ian

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Posts
    681
    Dowels will almost certainly go quicker - both to completion and to failure

    I think it would be hard to beat a properly drawbored M&T joint for this application.

    Mike

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Peet View Post
    Dowels will almost certainly go quicker - both to completion and to failure

    I think it would be hard to beat a properly drawbored M&T joint for this application.

    Mike
    +1 Go with the M&T if you want it to last, although I wouldn't drawbore them - I'd just do plain glued M&T.

    Mike
    Go into the world and do well. But more importantly, go into the world and do good.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Northern BC
    Posts
    10
    Couldn't have said it better myself. Contained in Todd's two profound short sentences, is a lot of sage advice; if you think about it.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    243
    When I built my bench (not roubo style) I needed a way to allow the top to move seasonally and my solution was to key it in place with dowels to the front legs and let it float over the rear legs. It has been 1.5 years since this build and it works perfectly, the front is perfectly aligned with the front of the legs and I can confirm that the back moves properly while staying flat (it is 3" thick SYP).

    All the other joints are M&T and should be for strength when doing heavy plane work.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    South Coastal Massachusetts
    Posts
    6,824
    The chief advantage of the Ruobo design is the massive top loading the mechanical dovetail joints together tightly.

    I like the fixtures of the Ruobo top, but not the leg arrangement. I use a cabinet under the bench, with drawers and a sliding leg across the front.
    If you're considering alternatives to the most traditional design, have a look over at the Benchcrafted Shaker bench page for some ideas.

    FWIW - I think you will find the dowel system adequate to normal use, and you'll have a useable tool much sooner.

    jim
    wpt, ma

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •