Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: Jay Bates Bandsaw Accident

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2023
    Location
    Manzanita, OR
    Posts
    8
    I think part of it is that 1) we don't normally think of a bandsaw as a rotational machine, and 2) we also think of it as a relatively safe tool compared to many other machines. I have had fewer issues with high risk operations and the close calls tend to be in simpler, seemingly low risk situations. Some of it may be focus and some just the ratio of high to low risk tasks.

    There's also the severity and frequency factors. I'm careful with my miter saw partly because even though I'm careful I manage to jam it or have it fling small offcuts every now and then - good little reminders when I get a little lax. I use powered hand-drills much more often, and other than maybe dropping it, the battery-powered drills with clutches are very safe in my experience. And then you pull out your dad's old hole-hawg right angle drill for electrical work and think "Hey, I'm just drilling holes" - when things go wrong with that, they really go wrong. I once read that drill presses accounted for a very low number/percentage of injuries, but had one of the highest fatality rates (ie clothing or hair getting caught).

    My biggest take away from this thread:
    How easy it is for even very experience operators to get in to trouble when combining 1) a little distraction and/or hurry, 2) an odd/new operation and 3) using a machine they feel is at the safer end of the spectrum.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    New Westminster BC
    Posts
    3,113
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Balmer View Post

    My biggest take away from this thread:
    How easy it is for even very experience operators to get in to trouble when combining 1) a little distraction and/or hurry, 2) an odd/new operation and 3) using a machine they feel is at the safer end of the spectrum.
    One additional take away is repetitive operations. The first time you do an unusual cut can be dangerous because you may not be sure how the workpiece will react but even a routine operation can be dangerous as your mind goes into neutral and you stop concentrating on what you are doing. In Jay's case he was doing multiple cuts and stopped paying enough attention to which way he was feeding the piece.

  3. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Garson View Post
    In Jay's case he was doing multiple cuts and stopped paying enough attention to which way he was feeding the piece.
    Either way he would have fed that piece would have been dangerous.
    I wish everyone would stop making excuses for him and possibly tell him to take responsibility for his actions. Maybe do a thorough analyses of what he did and what he should have done and not repeat what he did.
    Showing videos of people doing unsafe operations, who are lucky enough not to get injured, serves no one without further insight. He's already been lucky at least twice, how long before he either learns or becomes unlucky?
    Simply suggesting that turning the piece around is nowhere near enough IMO


    Disclaimer, I've cut innumerable round pieces on my bandsaw/s over the last few decades, I have all my digits. This and the statements in the previous thread are my professional opinion.

  4. #19
    Bandsaws are too quiet . A good safety engineer would design it to make intermittent noises, and put big ugly monster heads on top
    of those rounded shoulders.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Helensburgh, Australia
    Posts
    2,716
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward Weber View Post
    Either way he would have fed that piece would have been dangerous.
    Not quite correct. If a sled is used with the piece clamped to it cutting round pieces is safe to do. The use of sleds on BS's is yet to be widely known for some reason.
    Chris

    Everything I like is either illegal, immoral or fattening

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Inkerman, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,426
    Living is dangerous.. people who have knowledge, skill, experience, understand the danger and have the focus and commitment to deal with it. The same operation done by other less prepared will send themselves to the emergency room. The same operation does not present the same risk for different people. It's all dangerous, but more so for some than others.

    Last edited by Mark Hennebury; 01-09-2024 at 6:21 PM.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    New Westminster BC
    Posts
    3,113
    Quote Originally Posted by Edward Weber View Post
    Either way he would have fed that piece would have been dangerous.
    I wish everyone would stop making excuses for him and possibly tell him to take responsibility for his actions. Maybe do a thorough analyses of what he did and what he should have done and not repeat what he did.
    Showing videos of people doing unsafe operations, who are lucky enough not to get injured, serves no one without further insight. He's already been lucky at least twice, how long before he either learns or becomes unlucky?
    Simply suggesting that turning the piece around is nowhere near enough IMO


    Disclaimer, I've cut innumerable round pieces on my bandsaw/s over the last few decades, I have all my digits. This and the statements in the previous thread are my professional opinion.
    Did you watch the same video I watched? He admitted he was wrong several times, and explained why. He posted the video as a warning to others not to make same mistake and as someone already said there was a thread on this video several months ago. In that thread we discussed that he did not do a good job of explaining the correct safe way to do it but at least he educated some people on how dangerous cutting a cylinder on the bandsaw is. Was this a perfect video? No, but it still might save someone from making the same mistake even if they have to look elsewhere to find out the safe way to do it,

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Inkerman, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,426
    I think that we would be better to assess operations on a scale of risk, and operators on a level of ability, to accurately arrive at the probability of success. I don't believe that just saying the operation has a high level of danger and should not be done. You have to factor in the operator to put a value on the chance of success. They work in combination. Too many are quick to condemn an operator for doing a high risk operation without knowing anything about the operator. If you applied that to sports we wouldn't have any. Obviously what the guy Bates did on the bandsaw had a high degree of risk, but was doable, he however did not have the level of ability to do it.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Northern Michigan
    Posts
    5,040
    There are just times when you need to walk away from the shop. This is hard if you are in business, but still...

    Case in point: On the first anniversary after my wife left I was working and did something that I know I should not do, but my mind was elsewhere. A large piece on the saw cocked and caught and the corner of the piece drove itself into the middle of my hand. Creepiest injury I have ever seen. Had to have the fifth, fourth - third bones in my hand reconstructed. Stainless rods, tendons reattached. Lost 5 months work. I knew I was distracted, love of my life and all that jazz, and I should have taken the day off. Sometimes smart people do dumb things.

  10. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Hennebury View Post
    I think that we would be better to assess operations on a scale of risk, and operators on a level of ability, to accurately arrive at the probability of success. I don't believe that just saying the operation has a high level of danger and should not be done. You have to factor in the operator to put a value on the chance of success. They work in combination. Too many are quick to condemn an operator for doing a high risk operation without knowing anything about the operator. If you applied that to sports we wouldn't have any. Obviously what the guy Bates did on the bandsaw had a high degree of risk, but was doable, he however did not have the level of ability to do it.
    I agree, although I have no idea of operators "level of ability".
    On a scale of 1-10, the cut can be anywhere on the scale, from caged in a form using push blocks (1) to free-hand with no safety devices (10). The way he went about it put the cut at a higher level than it needed to be.
    So for me, it's not the operation at all, it's the operator. It's his responsibility to make the conditions of the cut safer.

    Half of the time spent being a woodworker is figuring out how to cut, attach, or shape wood in a safe efficient manner.

  11. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Parks View Post
    Not quite correct. If a sled is used with the piece clamped to it cutting round pieces is safe to do. The use of sleds on BS's is yet to be widely known for some reason.
    I was referring to simply turning the piece around, as some have suggested, to have the handle first and act as a support to keep the piece from rotating.
    Safer, a bit, but not the answer.

    Why people don't use sleds is in direct proportion with those who still struggle with blade drift.

    Align the blade, fence and miter slot parallel and sleds become much more widely used

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •