Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Rediscovering the Stanley #80

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I got rid of mine. Not that it didn't work. It worked flawlessly. But I found that I either used my card scraper for small spots or my No. 12 (actually the Sargent equivalent) for larger spots. So the 80 just sat, unused, unless I made it a point to use it. It's a great tool, and a lot easier to setup than the No. 12 (which is a bear). But it doesn't do large areas as efficiently as the No. 12 and the bare card scraper is just so much more convenient, so long as you're not doing a lot with it.

    Posts like this make me miss it and want to buy another. But then I remember that for my workflow, it's hard to justify the space (albeit small) that it takes up. It's rare that I do a "medium amount" of scraping. It's always either a spot or two, or the whole board.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    twomiles from the "peak of Ohio
    Posts
    12,287
    Rehab Scraper, Join the fleet.JPG

    have 2...one set coarse...one set fine..
    A Planer? I'm the Planer, and this is what I use

  3. #3
    I never though of having two. When I get two someone seems to talk me out of one. It is a good idea to have two, thanks.
    Tom

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michiana
    Posts
    3,101
    Kind of a crappy photo but it's nice grain.

    53657436330_1f04a4f0c8_k.jpg
    Sharp solves all manner of problems.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Michiana
    Posts
    3,101
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Harris View Post
    I got rid of mine. Not that it didn't work. It worked flawlessly. But I found that I either used my card scraper for small spots or my No. 12 (actually the Sargent equivalent) for larger spots. So the 80 just sat, unused, unless I made it a point to use it. It's a great tool, and a lot easier to setup than the No. 12 (which is a bear). But it doesn't do large areas as efficiently as the No. 12 and the bare card scraper is just so much more convenient, so long as you're not doing a lot with it.

    Posts like this make me miss it and want to buy another. But then I remember that for my workflow, it's hard to justify the space (albeit small) that it takes up. It's rare that I do a "medium amount" of scraping. It's always either a spot or two, or the whole board.
    I used to have a Keen Kutter version of the Stanley #12. I found it in "as new" condition at a church bazaar. It worked really well, but I never used it. A KK collector was happy to get it. At the time I had four #80 plus the #12 and a #81. Downsizing was a good thing.
    Sharp solves all manner of problems.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •